• Review of Universal’s Horror Nights

    Halloween Horror NightsLast Friday, after hearing many positive reviews of the event, I attended Halloween Horror Nights which takes place at Universal Studios in Hollywood. I was left wondering how so many guests walked away with positive things to say.

    To be clear, I am no stranger to the world of haunts. I’ve worked at several myself as a scare actor, and have attended many more. I’ve found that most haunts have their own strengths and weaknesses, but it seems that Universal has very few strengths to trumpet. I found this pretty shocking considering that Universal is not only a real live working film studio, but also because it has a history of horror films to draw on. (Hell, it’s very name is practically synonymous with the horror of the 30′s, 40′s and 50′s.) As a Halloween horror destination, it’s not very scary nor very interesting.

    Horror Nights has a little over a handful of mazes. (Seven of them as compared to Knotts Scary Farm’s thirteen.) Because of this, once the night gets rolling, the wait times skyrocket. As you walk around the park, there are boards listing wait times and only a few had anything listed under sixty minutes. There are only a few rides, which also experience higher wait times. Then, lastly, there was one live show.

    On the night that I attended, my basic ticket cost $57, and I was only able to experience a little over half of the attraction offerings. For almost double the price, I could have gotten a pass that allowed me to skip to the front of the lines, but since there’s so little content, I imagine you could do everything in a few hours, leaving you with a lot of extra time where you’re either bored or have to start repeating attraction visits. As a comparison, a basic Knott’s ticket on the same night of the week will cost around $47, for more than double the attractions (maybe triple when you could in all of the rides and shows available to haunt guests). From a basic monetary standpoint, Universal simply doesn’t live up to the price.

    To get into a more specific review, I will start by saying I believe that with all haunts, terror should start at the door. Upon entering the park, you are thrust into a fog-filled clown nightmare that should have set the tone for the rest of the evening. Unfortunately, nearly all of the scare actors were in full rubber masks (something that occurred in nearly all of the evening’s events). Rubber masks have their time and place, and I know they’re cheaper and easier than makeup, but these are the first scare actors to greet your audience. They are in your customer’s faces. Rubber masks when close up tend to be less shocking that a really good makeup job.

    Secondly, the entry area of Universal suffered from a proliferation of chainsaws. Chainsaws are scary. They’re loud and should make the hairs on the back of your neck stand on end. However, when there’s a dozen of them running around and whirring like mad, they lose some of that essence. You start to acclimate to them, and it ruins the terror they should instill.

    Aside from the entry area, the park was pretty free of scare actors. I hate to make comparisons again, but you can’t take two steps at Knotts without running into another monster. It keeps the tension up in between attractions. Universal also missed a golden opportunity to place monsters along the attraction lines. There was a perfect captive audience, ripe for scaring, who instead spent most of their wait looking bored and checking Facebook.

    Of the few mazes available, the ones I was able to get into were The Wolfman, The Thing: Assimilation, Alice Cooper’s Welcome to My Nightmare and Scream for Your Life. None of them were particularly good.

    - The Wolfman: This maze had to utilize a preexisting space, and in places it showed. The walkthrough area they used normally showcases imagery and sets from various Universal horror films. They really should have worked harder at retheming the parts that were out of place, rather than trying to shoehorn Wolfman elements in. The best part about this maze were the actual werewolf costumes as they really resembled the look from the film. They also worked in the feral boy look from the movie. This maze was consistently the shortest wait all night, likely because the 2010 film remake was not terribly successful. I still felt it was one of the more pleasant ones to experience at the haunt.

    To go on a quick tangent, why not just amp up the attraction that is already there? From what I’m reading online, there are normally scare actors in there anyway that fit the variously themed rooms. It would likely have been more effective than their attempted overlay.

    - Alice Cooper’s Welcome to My Nightmare: This was the first maze I went through and I can’t really say that there was anything about it I liked. It has the same issue as all the others in that it focuses almost solely on what I call “jump out” scares. To me, a jump out scare is one where the actor jumps from their hiding place at you, sometimes while making a banging noise or rattling a noise can. They are cheap scares and are almost always going to get the guest to twitch. However, their twitch is a natural reaction to something coming at them at high speed, not necessarily a real indication of true terror. It’s almost always more impressive when the scare actor can freak a patron out by their very presence, or the idea the guest can’t avoid walking by them and is terrified at the prospect. Also, having a monster ahead of you that catches your focus can be a distraction from the jump out scare actor. This misdirection leads to an even bigger fright as guests are less likely to start intentionally gazing around for hiding places.

    The other huge annoyance of this maze (and several others) was the use of heavy hanging plastic and fake bodies along the maze route. It was tiring to consistently have to push everything away to just get through the maze. It wasn’t scary, it was frustrating. There is also nothing like getting hit by a heavy body prop swinging backwards from the guests ahead of you. This element could have been used far more sparingly and been more effective because of it.

    - The Thing: Assimilation: While this was the best of the mazes I went through, that really isn’t saying much. It was far better themed than any of the others and had a nice mix of actors in makeup and ones in giant “Thing” costumes. It was obvious they were trying to do something to help bump up interest in the recent release of the film prequel. (Sadly, the maze was better than the abysmal movie.) The maze had a very creepy vibe, it was accurately themed, it had a nice mix of scare techniques, and it also had an average wait time of ninety minutes. I don’t believe that any five minute maze is worth that much wait time.

    - Scream for Your Life: This should have easily been the best part of the night, but it wasn’t. Scream for Your Life is a sort of open air maze that takes place on the actual studio backlot and uses real movie sets. But before you even get to that part, you have to hop on the studio tram to get out to the location. Again, here was a wasted opportunity. The spiel on the ride over was cheesy, and there were no frights along the way. Universal, you had a captive audience that paid for scares, so scare them already!

    The tram dropped us off near the Whoville set and then wound us around the Bate’s Motel, the Psycho House, some of the War of the Worlds set and a few other small areas. I feel like a broken record, but yet again, there was an over-abundance of rubber masks and chainsaws. I did run into a “Norman” outside of the Psycho house, and that was pretty cool, but short-lived. There were a few less jump out scares, which was a nice break, but it was pretty lackluster regardless.

    The only other Halloween specific attraction we were able to experience was Bill and Ted’s Excellent Halloween Adventure, and it was a whole lot less excellent that its name would have you believe, unless they meant it to be in excellently poor taste.

    The show is an attempt at making fun of all things pop culture, but it only manages to be pretty boring and tacky. Rife with booty shorts and lame jokes, it was an hour of my life I can never have back. It’s also another shining example of why Knotts has the better haunt as they too have a pop culture extravaganza and it’s actually funny and makes more sense.

    The other discomforting thing about this show is that it was either written before Osama Bin Laden was pronounced dead, or someone has a really poor sense of when they’ve crossed a line. I don’t want to get political here, but having Bin Laden as the main villain of the production just seemed wrong. And even if he wasn’t dead, it seems far from topical. (When was the last time you honestly heard a Bin Laden joke aside from immediately after his death?) Furthermore, when you set him alongside characters spoofing TRON and The Avengers, it gets even creepier, and not in a good way.

    All in all, Universal’s haunt is not something I would attend again. I know the economy is bad and that this event must have been expensive, but for the price and quality it’s just not a fair bargain. Besides that, I’ve been to smaller local haunts that have packed a far bigger punch on what is certainly less of a budget. There was so much wasted potential, and that’s what makes me saddest.

    -


  • SyFy’s Being Human Episode 3

    Being Human Aidan and Bishop

    Aidan and Bishop

    Last night was the premier of the third episode of SyFy’s “Being Human”. The show, again, did not disappoint. However, there were some definitely highlights as well as some speed bumps along the way.

    The thing that irritates me about the show right now is that there is more potential that hasn’t been fully realized to this point. My husband hit the nail on the head when he said he hasn’t connected with the characters yet. Three episodes in or not, there should still be a stronger connection felt between the audience and the cast. BBC’s first season had only six episodes to accomplish this, but it had me from the first one. I’m hoping that SyFy is just being slower to develop the personalities and that some more heartfelt moments are forthcoming.

    That all being said, I see a glimmer of something deeper shining under the surface of what SyFy has given us so far. There were some moments where Aidan actually had a personality outside of the brooding vampire stereotype, and I want them to give the actor more of a chance to explore that further. The problem I see them facing is that they’re competing with a number of other supernatural shows that have done very well, so it’s hard not to follow the formula that so obviously works with an American audience. I’m seeing this trickle down even into what powers the vampires possess. Super speed? Mind control? Needing permission before crossing the threshold? All unnecessary. Part of the reason the vampires in the original are so interesting is that they don’t really have a lot of creepy supernatural whatsits going for them. They are simply that scary without the aid of “trendy” vampire abilities.

    The ante was upped on Josh’s werewolf abilities in episode three. We got a glimpse of a nearly full moon and it was having a definite effect on him. I think what happened because of it was a little forced, but making him wolfier outside of a full moon night is alright with me if done correctly. They might have done better employing a little more subtlety, but the idea that he’s fighting his nature even when he still looks human makes things interesting.

    Sally is still the least interesting character to me. She got a bit of a boost in the last episode, but there weren’t any real breakthroughs by way of her personality. Sure, she learned to do some new things, but did the character really grow because of them? I feel like she’s very apart from Aidan and Josh when they should feel more like three peas in a pod.

    Speaking of ghosts, Sally’s plot was pulled from an episode of the original series, and it wasn’t done nearly as well. Those that have seen both shows likely know what I’m talking about. To me, it felt rushed and a little less than genuine. They should have taken their time instead of trying to cram it into one episode.

    There were some very genuine laugh out loud moments last night. The cast and writers seemed to have loosened up a bit, and it made a good balance to the drama. Of course, there were a couple of unintended laughs. (A little over the top werewolf sniffing definitely didn’t help.) Still, it was needed after two episodes that had very little real humour in them.

    Based on the preview for next Monday’s show, I’d have to say we’re in for more plot pulled from the original. I got the impression that they’re going to attempt another cram session, but we’ll see. It’s still a fun show and worth the watching.

    Oh, and SyFYI…I still liked it better when you were SciFi.

    -


  • SyFy’s Being Human Episode 2

    Josh and Aiden Being Human

    At least they're easy on the eyes.

    This is my status report for SyFy’s “Being Human” as of episode two. The final report? Still pretty decent.

    I won’t go into the nitty gritty specifics of the second episode so as not to spoil it. I will say that I found it to be a little anti-climactic after the last one. The episode is a lot of set up, and the pacing seems a little rushed. The dialogue is decent, but there were a couple of bumps. It appears to be one of those bridge episodes where you need to see it to understand certain things, but not a lot really happens either.

    To me, the one thing the show suffers from is the fact that it’s an American remake. For some reason, we just can’t seem to get it quite as right as the people across the pond. Now, that’s not to say the show is bad. (I already said it was decent.) It’s just that it seems to pale in comparison. Maybe that will change when they deviate from the source material, but we won’t know until the series gets further in. Last night’s episode had some nearly shot-for-shot scenes and some mildly altered dialogue, so the differences between the two versions of the show were a little jarring.

    I can’t quite pinpoint exactly what it is that makes the BBC’s “Being Human” work better, but I think that a part of it is how genuine it feels. In the original, you really sympathize with the characters. It’s almost heartbreaking at times. The American version feels a little more scripted and packs a little less punch. For example, in the original, the character George is often very awkward. In the remake Josh (their version of George) feels like he’s TRYING to be awkward. The intent is still there, but it doesn’t deliver.

    The character that I’m finding the most different from their British/American counterpart is Herrick/Bishop. Herrick is just so much more creepy. I’m not sure how to describe it, but he makes my skin crawl. Bishop, while pretty good, doesn’t give me the same sense of dread.

    I’m also not particularly keen on Sally, who is the series’ ghost. I’d read one review that said this character really stole the show, but I firmly disagree. Annie, from the original, is far more sympathetic, and I’m much more emotionally drawn to her.

    Overall, the show has piqued my interest enough that I’ll be tuning in next Monday night for episode three. If you’re interested in catching up, SyFy is putting episodes online for your viewing pleasure. They also give you three chances to watch new episodes each Monday night. (Check local listings, blah, blah, blah.)

    So give it a looksee, and as always, SyFy is still a stupid name.

    -


  • SyFy’s Being Human

    Being Human USTonight I sat down, fully prepared to start drinking heavily if things went awry, to watch SyFy’s adaptation of the British show Being Human. But the moment for drinking never came. Be shocked and amazed when I say that SyFy’s pilot for Being Human was actually pretty good.

    I LOVE the original BBC show. I’ve been a fan since the first one off that was produced prior to it being picked up as a regular show. It’s quirky, it’s heart felt, it’s even disturbing. I don’t know if the American version will live up to that in the least, but the first episode was a good start.

    Despite the fact that they changed the character’s names from the original (not sure why that is), they seem to be on track by way of personality and trademark attitudes. Josh (the George of this series) still wears his signature Star of David and has OCD tendencies. (He’s a lot less whiny, but let’s face it, how many men can match Russell Tovey’s high pitched squeak?) Aiden (our Mitchell equivalent) is still a vampire trying to go clean. However, so far he seems a little less tortured about the whole thing. Then there’s Sally (the Annie of the group) whom I still have to make up my mind about. She isn’t in the pilot long enough to really form a full opinion of.

    Being the werewolf fan that I am, I was mostly interested in seeing how they would handle the Josh character. I was already a bit of a fan of the actor (Sam Huntington) from his role in “Fanboys”. He seems to have this charm about him. Mix that charm with the torture of being a werewolf, and it seems like you’ve got a pretty good combination. As for his transformation; while I miss the practical effects of the original, the CGI wasn’t half bad for a television show.

    It seems like the plot is going to be fairly consistent with its UK counterpart. At least, that’s what I gleaned from the previews they showed for the rest of the season. I do wonder how much deviation is planned and how much might come as a result that in the UK a six episode season is normal and Americans balk at such a small number. I could see SyFy exhausting its source material rather quickly if they keep at the pace of the first episode. You can also factor in that IMDB has 13 episodes listed for the first season. That’s twice the amount of the UK show, unless SyFy plans on backing the episodes down to 30 minutes apiece aside from the first one.

    Some of the humour of the original show seems to have carried over. There is a lot of potential for the dynamic between the characters to be charming and genuine, but this is SyFy we’re talking about. I am well and truly shocked that the first episode was as good as it was. Of course, I’m rather spoiled after watching the BBC original.

    What really kills me about this show is the marketing. It’s terrible. SyFy went the stereotypical route. “The Lady Killer”, “The Wild Man” and “The Free Spirit”. Give me a freaking break. We have so many damn shows running alongside this one such as True Blood, Vampire Diaries and The Gates. They couldn’t come up with a more interesting marketing campaign? I’m also not sure what is supposed to represent the “i” in “Being” in the show logo. It kind of looks like they were trying to make it a person’s outline, but right now it looks like someone accidentally smudged the ink on the logo before it could dry.

    All in all, I wouldn’t be sad in any way, shape or form to have the US adaptation of the show be decent. I just have no faith in SyFy whatsoever. I suppose only time will tell.

    …and “SyFy” is still a stupid name.

    -


  • Keeping Busy

    Unfortunately, I haven’t had much time to write a new article here on my site, but I’m hoping to soon. In the meantime, check out my articles for ComicAttack.net and ThinkLeet.com:

    Of Bouncy Bits and Cleavage Windows

    I Fight in Heels: Balancing Women in Comics

    Learn New Words With Horror Movies

    My Wolf Man inspired photo shoot was also featured on Werewolf-News.com:

    Werewolf Costume Photo Sets

    -